Normal
This is overly verbose and I hope you're not insinuating that I'm in the dominant group in this context. It's not true, a Transsexual can claim discrimination at the hands of a Black person and ruin that Black person's life but a Black person cannot do the opposite to the Transsexual. A transsexual can do the same to a White person and unless it's the most egregious form of discrimination the white person will go untouched.This is not true and most likely projection. I want to state, I'm not taking any offense to what you are saying and I hope you feel the same. I just want to have a dialogue with you. If any of this is triggering let me know and we'll part ways amicably.I addressed this when I said "But when we evolve the rules we shouldn't make it at the expense of others unless those others were enriched by the previous disenfranchisement." There were people making fortunes off the enslavement and disenfranchisement of Black Americans and so they deserved to have their freedoms taken away. That's why I also said people should have the right to exercise their freedom as long as it doesn't infringe on someone else's right to do the same. Someone's freedom to enslave takes away someone else's freedom to pursuit life and liberty.It is intellectually dishonest to create your own goal posts and or framing of the conversation unbeknownst to others and then use it as the standard to uphold replies. The entire conversation has been about content, to interject structure as the critical component and then judge me for not look to it is a nice tactic but it doesn't promote understanding.I understand this metaphysically but once again these are things that have to be framed. Nowhere in the thread have we had a conversation about inter-connectedness in a higher dimension and how we are all figments of the godhead. We are talking about the conversation within our reality frame or better yet, within the confines of the 3 dimensions and laws of physics that govern our current temporal experience.
This is overly verbose and I hope you're not insinuating that I'm in the dominant group in this context. It's not true, a Transsexual can claim discrimination at the hands of a Black person and ruin that Black person's life but a Black person cannot do the opposite to the Transsexual. A transsexual can do the same to a White person and unless it's the most egregious form of discrimination the white person will go untouched.
This is not true and most likely projection. I want to state, I'm not taking any offense to what you are saying and I hope you feel the same. I just want to have a dialogue with you. If any of this is triggering let me know and we'll part ways amicably.
I addressed this when I said "But when we evolve the rules we shouldn't make it at the expense of others unless those others were enriched by the previous disenfranchisement." There were people making fortunes off the enslavement and disenfranchisement of Black Americans and so they deserved to have their freedoms taken away. That's why I also said people should have the right to exercise their freedom as long as it doesn't infringe on someone else's right to do the same. Someone's freedom to enslave takes away someone else's freedom to pursuit life and liberty.
It is intellectually dishonest to create your own goal posts and or framing of the conversation unbeknownst to others and then use it as the standard to uphold replies. The entire conversation has been about content, to interject structure as the critical component and then judge me for not look to it is a nice tactic but it doesn't promote understanding.
I understand this metaphysically but once again these are things that have to be framed. Nowhere in the thread have we had a conversation about inter-connectedness in a higher dimension and how we are all figments of the godhead. We are talking about the conversation within our reality frame or better yet, within the confines of the 3 dimensions and laws of physics that govern our current temporal experience.
