Search results

Granted but you do believe in the same foundational belief of white supremacy, separation. White Supremacy: "I am separate from black people because they are not white, therefore I am superior." You (not an accusation, just to illustrate an example): "I am separate from white people because...

I agree with you. The code is a step back from the truth which is we are one, but you gotta meet people where they are.

They believed in white supremacy. That's why they were defeated. Let me clarify: white supremacy is an ego. The ego is the belief in separation. Africans believed in separation, the exact same lie as white supremacy. Only it took different forms like my tribe is separate from/superior to yours...

The world is bigger than black people? Yes and no. Individuals that speak of everyone's injustices such as racism, homophobia, transphobia, classism then talk about how we must tie them in to our existence don't understand them deep enough. They are the same thing. The only differences are...

None of that worked because it was still dualistic: we are 2 separate entities who come together on this thing but it is possible for me to win while you lose. It's basis legitimized white supremacy's foundational lie and then presumed to fight the very lie it just legitimized. White supremacy...

It's not really "forward thinking". People have known about and have been teaching non-duality for thousands of years. I don't know if Childish Gambino and Frank Ocean have a non-dualistic thought process. Most of these black LGBT celebs would agree with me in regards to what exactly? Which...

I'm sure you know I'm not going to be able to respond to this, but I know it won't matter what I say if I did anyway. Respect.

We are not bodies. I agree, it is offensive to call this an illusion to someone that believes otherwise. And I apologize if I've triggered anyone to suffering. Everyone has the right to figure this out on their own time. I do not intend to force this knowledge on anyone, but point out the belief...

It was more so a redirection of misplaced resentment because I did paraphrase that the transsexual community did not make things the way they are so they cannot change them to be more fair, but I take your point. I did not recognize the B1 perspective because white people I've talked to say...

This was an accurate statement. Most everything else you said was projection and actually has nothing to do with me. But this statement is interesting to me because it is correct. I am using B1 as a means to an end. That end is justice for black people (Isn't that also why you subscribe to it?)...

I did not change the subject from black people's justice to something else. I did not defend LGBT. I did not suggest anyone was seeing black empowerment the wrong way. I did not call anyone's agenda wrong. Black people caping for everyone IS black people caping for themselves. B1 is exactly the...

This is not how Black Lives Matter hijacked the black American social movement in Ferguson. They did that with money. With money, they changed the narrative. With a belief in "social justice" as something separate from justice, they changed the narrative. With the belief that justice can be...

I was being presumptuous. I thought you believed "male" and "female" fell into one or both categories: sex/gender. I literally gave the 3 division idea my praise the very 1st time it came up and continued to accept it as a viable solution for the time being, but yes, I believe it will present...

Apparently it is, people are slipping through. Changed their behavior from doing something to doing nothing. What I know of it is it's supposed to turn straight black men gay and/or emasculate them. Is that accurate? Both things are literally impossible so it is directly benign, but...

You are describing a spectrum based on sex/gender. I'm just saying there is probably a better metric that does the same thing, more efficiently and would easily accommodate newer information as it is revealed. I have presented a solution which tries to account for unknown unknowns but the...

I don't see officials attempting to solve the issue. I see them ignoring it.

I am probably unusual in this space as I come from a prospective that is unusual from what I have observed. I addressed as much as I could as accurately as I could, but I cannot control how I am perceived. It is inevitable that I be misunderstood. If my prospective is unwanted, I will leave.

I believe it would be beneficial to modify the way we decide who competes with who because gender is showing cracks as is evident in this conversation. We used gender because it was what we knew, but that does not mean it is the ONLY metric that can be used to decide a fair competition. I...

I am not aware of the places they have added new divisions for other genders. I figure this video/conversation is evidence that's not happened, the tradition is still in place.

I keep talking around it because it is not relevant to my point. I have already acknowledged sex based divisions have "worked" (probably have always been leaving people out) but we are now aware, it's not enough so we have the opportunity to devise new ways. The issues that we are having today...