True. Them getting a wake up call was written more in hope than in expectation. I dont wish harm on those sistas, but we all know how this type of foolishness can play out.
With this case, I've been catching some commentary and small clips. I agree, whats being said in the testimony is madness. Gonna be paying attention to how its being reported as well as whats being reported. These cases tend to have certain agendas attached.
"Stay put, because this is a warzone, and you don't know what could happen". Thats the problem, it is a war zone and WE DO KNOW what could happen. Telling someone to stay in a war zone is effectively giving them a death sentence. Cant help but question why she would push that.
Any time they say something slick, am having to pause for an extra second and then responding. If I cant think of anything to say, then they get "no face". It seems to be working, but trying not to be complacent. They have plenty of tricks up their sleeves.
For example, when on a Zoom or Teams call, Karens will make slick comments if you choose to blur out or use a background on your location i.e. "You have palm trees in the background, you must be doing ok to be in a location like that!" or "is your place blurry!". Im paraphrasing, but hopefully...
I watched the broadcast again. I also got the impression he was using the Ye situation as a case study as opposed to caping for him. Not to say that Ye has not been acting off code, but like you say, it was a comparison between the reporting of Ye and Em.
Preach! The caller must have misunderstood the title of the broadcast, and thought it was an attack of black men's feelings. (Was slightly facetious but that caller was disappointing).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.