Should coons be recognized as part of our History? Should we recognize and/or contextualize their damage/effect/contributions to our history or political debate?
News
Politics, Current Events, and Serious Discussion
Share
Stats
Should We Recognize These Folks During Black History Month As Well?? Your Thoughts....
- Messages
- 1,011
- Reputation
- 1,370
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- zBucks
- 9,261
- Sex
- Male
- Race
- Black
- Origin
- USA
We should recognize them as the sell out anti black coons that they are. Nothing more.
There is nothing to honour, they made the choice to "go along with it" in order to elevate their own position.
They have no consciousness or ideology that will be able to liberate others.
They are narcissists who have the audacity to be shocked when we see through their charade.
They have climbed over the sacrifices corpses of Our Collective Kin and declared themselves (mis)leadership.
They chose to be pets instead of Human beings
Fuck 'em
They have no consciousness or ideology that will be able to liberate others.
They are narcissists who have the audacity to be shocked when we see through their charade.
They have climbed over the sacrifices corpses of Our Collective Kin and declared themselves (mis)leadership.
They chose to be pets instead of Human beings
Fuck 'em
when it comes to history, I think it's important to highlight the good and bad. There are lessons to be learned from both.
Their politics don't align with mine and I don't much care for the ones I know in that picture but if they have done anything to help black folks, I think it is fair to recognize it. I don't follow any of these people to know and from what I understand, they tend to care more about their own images than helping black folks.
No offense, but this shouldn't even be up for discussion or debate. I recall white Republicans complaining Clarence Thomas wasn't in the African American museum. I responded on some youtube video about it "Why are white Republicans telling Black people who they should honor? That's not only arrogant but insulting"
They've done nothing important as far as changing the way that we as Black people live ,so no they are of no consequence unless we start a "Black Bootlick Hall of infamous"
or maybe bring back the
"C👀n Train Awards"
or maybe bring back the
"C👀n Train Awards"
How can you learn from the past if you omit parts of it? We have to talk about the guy that snitched on Nat Turner, the Black people that worked for the FBI, the time that Farrakhan ran and told on Malcolm X, why there's a guy on the roof, and every other distasteful part. We've been making the same mistakes over and over again because we look at life like a big ass church. The pastor and the deacons are godly, the past can be washed away with a prayer and the future can be manifested with obedience. Neither are true.
Coons are a large part of our history and have hindered us every step of the way. We MUST talk about them but in the same way we talk about Slavery and Jim Crow.
Coons are a large part of our history and have hindered us every step of the way. We MUST talk about them but in the same way we talk about Slavery and Jim Crow.
The only two people in that tweet who have done anything worthy of acknowledgement are Clarence Thomas and Ben Carson.
Ascending to the U.S. Supreme Court and being one of the top neurosurgeons in the world are undeniable achievements. I could see the case for those accomplishments (not Judge Thomas's or Dr. Carsons's political views) being footnotes during Black History Month.
Allen West is a run of the mill former politician, and David Clarke was a small county sheriff. Larry Elder is a dime a dozen media personality, and Candice Owens is a foreign YouTuber. Nobody in that group has done anything historic.