I simply refuse to be involved with, and support financially, an institution with does not benefit my people. The rhetoric taught is diametrically opposed to what we need as a people.
For real. I went to my grandpa’s church two weeks ago and a dude got on stage and said:I simply refuse to be involved with, and support financially, an institution with does not benefit my people. The rhetoric taught is diametrically opposed to what we need as a people.
What got you into it? How did you gravitate towards it?I no longer go to any church and never will again. I don't deal with Xtianity or any other religion. As an Israelite, I don't deal with religions and belief systems. being an Israelite is not another religion or belief system, it is my heritage that I have reclaimed.
The facts on the table dealing with world history and the prophesies in Scripture. When a 2000 year old book can call out history with spectacular accuracy, there must be something there.What got you into it? How did you gravitate towards it?
I have to ask, how do you reconcile with the fact that the text used has been altered by Europe? Are there movements to get bibles that predate king James or Catholicism?The facts on the table dealing with world history and the prophesies in Scripture. When a 2000 year old book can call out history with spectacular accuracy, there must be something there.
Ok that makes sense. I don’t like the Bible but I’ve seen some really good Hebrew groups that were disciplined and organized.The facts on the table dealing with world history and the prophesies in Scripture. When a 2000 year old book can call out history with spectacular accuracy, there must be something there.
Not sure what you mean by "altered". outside of translation errors, there is very few if any wholesale alterations to the original texts. One would need to exercise textual criticism to get through some of the discrepancies in translations.I have to ask, how do you reconcile with the fact that the text used has been altered by Europe? Are there movements to get bibles that predate king James or Catholicism?
I’m talking about the ecumenical councils and how the story of Jesus was created by Rome.Not sure what you mean by "altered". outside of translation errors, there is very few if any wholesale alterations to the original texts. One would need to exercise textual criticism to get through some of the discrepancies in translations.
So our you spiritual over religious?I Am The Temple Of The Universal Divine With In All Things And Thus I Only Commune With My True Self Which Some Call God.
That's understandable seeing how many of our people have spent a good portion of their lives dealing with the grand lie of Christianity. I would advise anyone who attends the Xtian church to leave today and never go back.Ok that makes sense. I don’t like the Bible but I’ve seen some really good Hebrew groups that were disciplined and organized.
I agree. Anything telling you to put your problems in someone else’s hands, to turn the other cheek, and to trust a man in the sky is problematic.That's understandable seeing how many of our people have spent a good portion of their lives dealing with the grand lie of Christianity. I would advise anyone who attends the Xtian church to leave today and never go back.
What was the Jesus that Rome created?I’m talking about the ecumenical councils and how the story of Jesus was created by Rome.
The Word Religion / Religious means to bind up or to bind back , so I just say that I am because I know that I am is a vibration.So our you spiritual over religious?
99.9% of all who say that they believe in Jesus of 2000 years ago don't realize that there was no letter j until around the late 1500's and thus that Jesus didn't exist.What was the Jesus that Rome created?
This would only show that The man's name isn't "Jesus" but not that the man didn't exist or that the narrative about him is untrue. This is another one of those translation errors I mentioned earlier.99.9% of all who say that they believe in Jesus of 2000 years ago don't realize that there was no letter j until around the late 1500's and thus that Jesus didn't exist.
The council of Chalcedon and council of Nicaea are two pivotal points where the Roman Empire changed the story of Jesus.What was the Jesus that Rome created?
What were these changes?The council of Chalcedon and council of Nicaea are two pivotal points where the Roman Empire changed the story of Jesus.
But the problem with that is that the church say there is power in the name of Jesus and if that wasn't his name then who are they talking bout and why are they not calling him by his real name . I can get the same thing with any name I choose because what it all comes down to is the emotion / spirit that is attached to it.This would only show that The man's name isn't "Jesus" but not that the man didn't exist or that the narrative about him is untrue. This is another one of those translation errors I mentioned earlier.
What were these changes?
Great point. Who are you speaking to when you say Jesus?But the problem with that is that the church say there is power in the name of Jesus and if that wasn't his name then who are they talking bout and why are they not calling him by his real name . I can get the same thing with any name I choose because what it all comes down to is the emotion / spirit that is attached to it.
These would be examples of a misinterpretation of the biblical data rather than a change in the data.The Council of Chalcedon created the trinity which caused the African churches to splinter off and create non-chalcedonian Christianity.
The council of Nicaea determined that Jesus was divine.
Not true. The Roman Empire literally wrote the story to keep the Empire from splitting up. There were pivotal people like Arius and Nestor who had opinions that were causing dissent and the government had to settle it via an ecumenical council.These would be examples of a misinterpretation of the biblical data rather than a change in the data.
The Xtian church says a lot of things. the Xtian isn't going to get anything out of calling Yahawah-Shi by His rightful name anyway because they Don't follow the law Which Yahawah-Shi told them to do.But the problem with that is that the church say there is power in the name of Jesus and if that wasn't his name then who are they talking bout and why are they not calling him by his real name . I can get the same thing with any name I choose because what it all comes down to is the emotion / spirit that is attached to it.
Show me the trinity in the biblical text..Not true. The Roman Empire literally wrote the story to keep the Empire from splitting up. There were pivotal people like Arius and Nestor who had opinions that were causing dissent and the government had to settle it via an ecumenical council.
I’m not going to play 20 questions. Rome manipulated the Bible and I gave two examples of it. Im not religious so it doesn’t matter to me. They have 12 major ecumenical councils and many more where hey crafted the story of the Jesus. If the book you read descends from that then you are reading a european depiction of Jesus.Show me the trinity in the biblical text..
If you can't answer my last question then your statement here is invalid. misinterpreting text and changing text aren't the same thing.If the book you read descends from that then you are reading a european depiction of Jesus.
I’ll concede that point.If you can't answer my last question then your statement here is invalid. misinterpreting text and changing text aren't the same thing.
I stopped back in my teens after realizing its just a show...Growing up my mom forced me to go to church every Sunday. These days I'm not very religious. I do believe in god, but I don't go to church much. I will go to church with my mom whenever I visit her though, but other than that, I haven't went to church in a couple years now. I've never been one to be too religious, but I say more power to you if you are. I respect anyone's choice to believe what they want. It's just never really been my thing.
No I dont go because if it isnt a weekly fashion show its a orgy house and it isnt what it use to be.Growing up my mom forced me to go to church every Sunday. These days I'm not very religious. I do believe in god, but I don't go to church much. I will go to church with my mom whenever I visit her though, but other than that, I haven't went to church in a couple years now. I've never been one to be too religious, but I say more power to you if you are. I respect anyone's choice to believe what they want. It's just never really been my thing.