It seems they play this game with People's lives twice a year....🤔⚠️✅️🤷🏾‍♂️

Was looking at these. A lot of people compare them to AirPods. I never tried them or know anyone who has them but I do have friends with AirPods and they do sound good. I don't use Apple products though. I am getting back into the swing of things and working out again and need a new pair of earbuds. The only working ones I have left are wired. Anyone have these? They worth the hype? They don't have a lot of reviews so I am sus about them. They are on Amazon for $79.

I have come to typically feel a lot of left leaning channels especially on YouTube such as Indisputable with Rashad Richey need to rethink their strategy.

If a police officer arrests and uses force in the process of an arrest and the guy turns out to be a drug dealer my opinion is don't defend these people. They are criminals.

We can't just defend every person simply on the basis that they are black. By all means police need to make arrests in a civil manner and not use excessive force. I'm not arguing against that.

However people shouldn't be dealing, using or in anyway involved with illegal drugs.

I just have a hard time defending anyone who puts themselves in that situation. My reason is it paints a negative stereotype of all black people.

If you do drugs, deal drugs and then the police shows to arrest you and you run, resist and aren't compliant then you get what you get.

By defending these criminals it weakens the argument when we need to defend someone like Philando Castile, George Floyd and John Crawford whom were completely innocent of any crime and were murdered nevertheless.

We can't just defend every person the way that Rashad Richey does. If they are guilty of a crime they need to be arrested and if they resist and it turns out badly then the consequences are what are.

White supremacists have been trying to say Black IQ is inherently lower than Whites since they started enslaving and colonizing us.

This is what I've sometimes countered with to shut that down.

1. How do you explain the whites of Scots Irish mostly ancestry in Kentucky, West Virginia and Tennessee, of Hatfields vs McCoy fame, Mountaineers, who upon arrival in the 1700s have inbred with each other, hasn't had any history of any semblance of even average intellect. They have been poor and inbred for 300 years. If Whites are inherently more intelligent, why haven't they even been able to surpass even poor Blacks in America who have 1000s of examples of rising and showing intellectual capacity? FBAs have a far higher percentage of degrees, and other metrics that attest to intelligence.

2. They like to site the ancient Greeks. If the Greeks are so intelligently superior, why aren't they leading in any intellectual pursuits now? Greeks have only had 2 Nobel prizes and neither are for any of the hard (Chemistry, Biology Physics) or social sciences (Economics). They got two in literature which is subjective.
St. Lucia, tiny black Caribbean nation, has just as many Nobel prizes and one of them is for Economics (other for Literature).

3. Nigerians have a higher percentage of degrees than Whites or even Asians.

4. Barbados HS students have consistently scored far higher than American whites have on the SATs, they are Black taught by Black teachers and have far less resources.

5. A recent thing they are now trying to say is 'Sub Saharan Africa had no written language prior to the Arabs and Europeans', well, if a written language is the barometer then when the Romans first went into present day Europe (France, Germany Belgium). They were living in caves or simple stick/wood homes with thatched roofs, no intellectual evidence whatsoever. They were alone for 1000s of years and didn't get past bow and arrows and basic swords. No written language. No clothing other than animal skin. They were basically slightly advanced Cave Men. Isolated from everyone and had no examples of intellect. The Benin tribes had detailed bronze busts, there are pyramids in sub Saharan Africa the same time as the Egyptians where geometry, and advanced mathematics were needed to build them. The only thing of note in Europe was Stonehenge in the UK.

The Vikings also have no written language and anything intellectual before they met outsiders. They talk about the Vikings but don't mention their lack of intellect.

They will do the 'I'm White and I say so'

Vlad's Chickens are coming home to roost as his days, according to doctors are numbered. And that all of if not MOST of his more recent appearances were body doubles because he's too ill to conduct business.



There's a part of me that's like "Never did I think I'd live to see the day" But there's another part of me that's like, American gov't is waiting with bated breath to see WHO they get to replace him because you know damn well, they'll look for ANY chink in the armor, if after all these years, there's even a HINT of a possibility, they can finally get someone under the American thumb. They'll definitely see this as an opportunity when you consider the "American Empire" is crumbling in on itself.

Login to view embedded media

Public schools are jacked up.



Fighting fail

Does anyone else find it weird that those who are usually so strongly anti-immigrant or mysteriously silent right now regarding what's going on in Chicago and New York City?

I mean normally the Republican and conservative side are up in arms about people coming over the border. They are the ones who were so on the build the wall movement. They're usually 100% behind ideologies like Trump blocking immigrants from coming into the country.

They are the ones that you always see and videos telling people to go back to Mexico and stuff like this. Yet right now you can hardly hear a peep from them regarding what is going on with the migrant crisis.

Not even the Republican politicians are saying anything. They are missing in action.

My thought is this : the reason you aren't hearing anything from Republican politicians and the reason they aren't making a big deal about this is because them and Democrats have collaborative and joint interest and bringing in immigrants to replace black people.

The Democrats are sick of having the pander to black people in order to get our votes. The Republicans are just sick of us altogether. All the Republicans will use anti-immigrant rhetoric to rile up their base and get votes however, they have no problem bringing in immigrants if it means replacing black people.

It's high time that black people wake up and realize the truth.

I believe the attack is apart of a larger strategy to lure the US into a protracted global conflict thus accelerating its demise. If the USA has to print money to fight in Ukraine, Middle East, Africa, and in Taiwan it will not only lose territory but will.also hyper inflate and possibly collapse.

Scary times we are in.

I loved this lounge. It's a bit of a ways away from the typical lights and sounds of the French Quarter/Bourbon Street but it's a perfect way to start an evening out on the town.

The crowd is mature. Their menu is diverse and Oh Yeah... they have really good hookah.

Great place for a drink date. Fellows, throw on a sportscoat and splash on the cologne and buy your lady a drinks.....

Login to view embedded media

Of course "Suzy Karen" Lives to tell the tale.....🙄

I watched a video about what's going on in Chicago regarding the migrant crisis. A black lady made the argument that this shouldn't be happening due to the fact that black citizens pay taxes and this isn't what they pay their taxes for.

Here are my thoughts on that:

'We can't use the argument of the fact that we are taxpayers thus we have a absolute say on where tax money goes.

To an extent that is true, but tax money always goes towards things that we may not necessarily agree with. For example, tax money may go to a war, subsidies for big corporations, bank and auto company bailouts, and other such things. These are all unpopular and most citizens would not want their money going towards these things. However, the government will make the decision (albeit due to corruption) to spend money on those things.

This also kills any argument asking for reparations, because by this logic racist citizens can say that they don't want their tax money going towards reparations. We as citizens don't get an absolute deciding factor as to where tax money goes.

The argument that we actually should be making is what the Democrat party and Brandon Johnson are doing is a break of the social contract.

Here is a brief definition and history of what social contract is for those who are unaware.

"an implicit agreement among the members of a society to cooperate for social benefits, for example by sacrificing some individual freedom for state protection. Theories of a social contract became popular in the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries among theorists such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, as a means of explaining the origin of government and the obligations of subjects."

The government has an obligation to take care of its citizens and keep them safe. They have broken that contract and instead use money that they could be spending on citizens to spend on people who aren't even citizens of the country. They are leaving citizens, homeless and destitute. They are taking away things that citizens need to live a good life such as parks, money for schools, and other things that would improve the situation of citizens.

Furthermore, they are bringing in an immigrant class which presents a substantial danger to the citizens.

This is all a break of the social contract. By virtue of the social contract following the law, working and doing the right thing, paying taxes, means that the government has to do its part.

I think it can be safely argued that the government and both Chicago and New York are not doing their part and have broken the contract with their citizens.

Just a thought!'

This was so quick!