It seems they play this game with People's lives twice a year....🤔⚠️✅️🤷🏾‍♂️

Login to view embedded media
He speaks about insider trading, how the hijackers were connected to CIA/FBI, he speaks on how flawed the 9/11 investigation was flawed and how the entire plan was known months ahead. It’s chilling listen.

A very common misperception is the view of politics as one party is good and not racist being the Democrats and the other party is bad and racist being the Republicans. The majority of the black community view politics in this almost child like manner.

This is so bad that I’ve met black people that think Abraham Lincoln was a Democrat unaware he was a Republican. They've never heard that the Democrats were originally the party of the KKK. They've never heard about the Southern Strategy. They can't tell you who Lee Atwater, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, or Kevin Phillips is.

At the time of Lincoln he was a Republican. That doesn't mean that the Republicans even at that time were great and this party for black people. Lincoln famously wrote in his reply to Horace Greely as below:

"My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy Slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that. What I do about Slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save this Union, and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union".

So you see he didn't end slavery because it was morally wrong. He did it to save the union.

The southern Democrats originally the Dixiecrats in 1956 signed the Southern Manifesto which was a document written in response to Brown v Board of Education and called for "states rights" and opposed desegregating public places. 19 U.S. Senators and 82 Representatives from the south almost all Democrats signed the document.

It was the Democrats who teamed up with states rights Republicans and blocked several civil rights legislations like the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the Civil rights Act of 1960 and the more famous Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Phillips worked for Richard Nixon's presidential campaign in 1968, and afterwards wrote a book on what has come to be known as the "Southern strategy" of the Republican Party. It was in 1970 that Kevin

Phillips wrote the following:

"All the talk about Republicans making inroads into the Negro vote is persiflage. Even 'Jake the Snake' [Senator Jacob Javits of New York] only gets 20 percent. From now on, Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote, and they don't need any more than that... but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats."

So you see southern white people divorced the Democrats the minute they weren't getting what they wanted which was oppression of black people.

After desegregation and the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 the Democrats largely got 80% or more of the black vote. Eventually, the Republicans all but gave up hope of winning back the black vote. They began to use racist dog whistle tactics to appeal to southern racists and win their votes. Essentially Republicans became racist because they couldn't win elections unless they were openly racist. Because of fear of losing votes they just used coded language.

It was in 1981 that Lee Atwater said the quiet part out loud when in an interview he said this:

" Y'all don't quote me on this. You start out in 1954 by saying, "n****r, n****r, n****r". By 1968, you can't say "n****r"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this", is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "n****r, n****r". So, any way you look at it, race is coming on the back-burner."

These tactics were used famously by Ronald Reagan. Even some Democrats used this type of coded language like Bill Clinton and Joe Biden.

You'll notice throughout this whole ordeal I never once pointed to any historical facts showing the the Democrats just quit being racists. That's because that never happened. What did happen is they needed that 80% or more of our vote so they couldn't be outright open about it anymore.

They like the Republicans adopted the part of the southern strategy where the codify their racism. They are just much better at doing it. What is even more insidious is their policy of benign neglect.

It was in Daniel Patrick Moynihan's Memo to President Richard Nixon that he stated on page 7:

"The time may have come when the issue of race could benefit from a period of "benign neglect. 11 The subject has been too much talked about. The forum has been too much taken over to hysterics, paranoids, and boodlers on all sides. We may need a period in which Negro progress continues and racial rhetoric fades. The administration can help bring this about by paying close attention to such progress --as we are doing --while seeking to avoid situations in which extremists of either race are given opportunities for martyr dom, heroics, histrionics or whatever. Greater attention to Indians, Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans would be useful.”

It was this policy that decimated black politics for the last 5-6 decades. Basically what was called for was to not pass blatantly racist policies like redlining, segregation, refusal of home loans etc. Instead they would just leave black people alone and ignore us. They would do nothing to intentionally hurt us but instead just leave us be. They would instead just give us nothing at all to help but not purposely do anything to help us. Their policy of benign neglect requires that they never promise us anything directly. They can't even directly say anything is specific for black people. This where terms like minority, people of color, disinvested neighborhoods, and the underprivileged etc. come into play.

Think of benign neglect sort of like this. Abuse is bad in all instances. The parent who comes home gets angry and upset about work and takes it out on the child by beating them with a board and slapping them. This is outright abuse. However the parent that doesn't quite make enough money and can't afford daycare and leaves the child that is too young home alone or the child is malnourished and not able to eat properly is also guilty of abuse. Their abuse isn't on purpose it is instead benign neglect. Benign because it isn't necessarily intentional.

The Democrats still hold their racist views from the past but can't just outright say it because they need our votes. So instead they pander to us. They however never offer us anything specific. We aren't even to be specifically named in legislation. Look the Emit Till Anti- Lynching Act. It doesn't even use any terms to indicate it is for black, African American people. All this bill did was make something already illegal a different classification. It was simply an amendment to US Title 18 Section 249.

here is the text of the bill/amendment:

The act amends section 249(a) of Title 18 of the United States Code[13] to include:

(5) LYNCHING.—Whoever conspires to commit any offense under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) shall, if death or serious bodily injury (as defined in section 2246 of this title) results from the offense, be imprisoned for not more than 30 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both.
(6) OTHER CONSPIRACIES.—Whoever conspires to commit any offense under paragraph (1), (2), or (3) shall, if death or serious bodily injury (as defined in section 2246 of this title) results from the offense, or if the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, be imprisoned for not more than 30 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both.

They didn't mention black people once anywhere in there. This is how deep into benign neglect Democrats are. They can't even mention us in legislation that is supposedly meant for us.

On the other hand Republicans whether they actually believe the racist sentiments and rhetoric that they push must appeal to southern racists in order to get those votes. They will always have to be open about their disdain of black people with dog whistle tactics right up to the point of not just saying outright saying something like "We hate n*ggers" . They will say every reason why white people should hate us and use all the negative stereotypes and pain us as the worst.

So you see the Republicans will beat us. The Republicans will say negative things about us. They will call us racial slurs. They will side with racist voters against us. They will use the dog whistle tactics. They hate us whether it's because we vote against them or they are just hate black people for no particular rhyme or reason.

However, the Democrats hate us too. However they need the vote. So they are perfectly okay with just letting black people starve to death instead even when they could just give us something to eat. Instead they will turn a blind eye as if they don't see it and let us keep getting more and more malnourished until we just die. That's the Democratic party.

The pods, made of steel and wood with a blackout curtain at one end, are arranged in a two-high, 14-long grid; residents share five bathrooms and a few common spaces, but don’t have a full kitchen or any laundry machines.

California is the future they want for us all. I can’t front, they look cozy but the disease and germs would be crazy.

From Rollie Forbes thread, "Black Brits try Popeyes for the first time ".

For as rich as this anti black racist is this bird faced clown stammers and stutters none stop. HE SOUNDS STUPID ASF!!!


Texas border

Maybe his speaking out against the Desantis history books version of slavery made him a pariah in the Republican party he decided to throw them a bone that he's still their lawn jockey symbol.

Its sad. White people came up with expanding welfare to blacks, pushed it to blacks. My older relatives remember when female white social workers were pushing it to sisters. No one in the civil rights groups were saying its a solution. It was the white liberal solution. Turned out to be a trick bag.

Why doesn't he advocate reparations (for FBAs)? He won't for obvious reasons. He will for red Indians and others.

Google User Data Has Become a Favorite Police Shortcut​

Investigators increasingly use warrants to obtain location and search data from Google, even for nonviolent cases—and even for people who had nothing to do with the crime.


By Julia Love and Davey Alba

September 28, 2023 at 12:01 AM EDT

One morning in January 2020, Robert Potts was loading up his SUV for a trip to the police academy in Raleigh, North Carolina. He started warming up the car, his mind on exams, and went back into his apartment to grab his lunch. When he returned the SUV was gone, along with a rubber training pistol, a set of handcuffs and a portable radio.

Raleigh cops found the SUV by lunchtime. Potts was distraught. Losing your gear is very bad form for a cop, especially a rookie, and the thief had walked off with some of Potts’, including the most sensitive item—the radio. Someone could use that to disrupt the police department’s communications with false reports. Potts’ supervisors reassured him they’d take care of it.


Potts returned his focus to exams, completely unaware of the events his early-morning blunder had set in motion. He says the Raleigh PD was able to remotely disable his radio, ensuring that their communications remained uncompromised. But the cops weren’t ready to drop the matter. In their determination to recover the radio, they capitalized on two cutting-edge investigative tools available to local law enforcement—both made possible by Google.

Parking lot where the SUV was stolen.

Within days of the theft, the Raleigh PD sent Google a search warrant demanding a list of people who were in the neighborhood when the gear was stolen. They also secured a judge’s order for the company to identify anyone who Googled “Motorola APX 6000,” the model of the radio, and similar phrases in the days after the device went missing. Google handed over user location data in response.

Google maintains one of the world’s most comprehensive repositories of location information. Drawing from phones’ GPS coordinates, plus connections to Wi-Fi networks and cellular towers, it can often estimate a person’s whereabouts to within several feet. It gathers this information in part to sell advertising, but police routinely dip into the data to further their investigations. The use of search data is less common, but that, too, has made its way into police stations throughout the country.

Police say these warrants can unearth valuable leads when detectives are at a loss. But to get those leads, officers frequently have to rummage through Google data on people who have nothing to do with a crime. And that’s precisely what worries privacy advocates.

Traditionally, American law enforcement obtains a warrant to search the home or belongings of a specific person, in keeping with a constitutional ban on unreasonable searches and seizures. Warrants for Google’s location and search data are, in some ways, the inverse of that process, says Michael Price, the litigation director for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers’ Fourth Amendment Center. Rather than naming a suspect, law enforcement identifies basic parameters—a set of geographic coordinates or search terms—and asks Google to provide hits, essentially generating a list of leads.


Police have been using versions of this method for decades. Security camera footage and cell tower data from phone companies all have the potential for invasions of privacy that go beyond searching a suspect’s trunk. But the sheer volume of information available from Google about where tens of millions of people have been and what they’ve searched for is unprecedented.

By their very nature, these Google warrants often return information on people who haven’t been suspected of a crime. In 2018 a man in Arizona was wrongly arrested for murder based on Google location data. Despite this possibility, police have continued to embrace the practice in the years since. “In many ways, law enforcement thinks it’s like hitting the easy button,” says Price, who’s mounting some of the country’s first legal challenges to warrants for Google’s location and search data. “It would be very difficult for Google to refuse to comply in one set of cases if it’s complying in another. The door gets cracked open, and once it’s open, it just becomes a floodgate.”

Google says it received a record 60,472 search warrants in the US last year, more than double the number from 2019. The company provides at least some information in about 80% of cases. Although many large technology companies receive requests for information from law enforcement at least occasionally, police consider Google to be particularly well suited to jump-start an investigation with few other leads. Law enforcement experts say it’s the only company that provides a detailed inventory of whose personal devices were present at a given time and place. Apple Inc., the other major mobile operating system provider, has said it’s technically unable to supply the sort of location data police want. That’s OK, because many iPhone users depend on Google Maps and other Google apps. Google’s search engine owns 92% of the market worldwide and is currently the focus of an antitrust lawsuit from the US Department of Justice.
A Google spokesperson says the company scrutinizes all demands for user data and challenges those that it finds to be overly broad. Recent court cases have better equipped the company to push back, it says. “There are legitimate requests that we get every day. At the same time, there are sometimes requests that can be so broad that they infringe privacy rights and are really inappropriate,” says Kent Walker, the president for global affairs at Google and its parent company, Alphabet Inc. “In a significant percentage of cases, we go back and forth with the government to try and narrow warrants.”

Bloomberg Businessweek collected and analyzed 115 warrants for the company’s location and search data in five states, one of the largest known reviews of such documents. The analysis, based on search warrants filed from 2020 to 2023 with courthouses in Austin, Denver, Phoenix, Raleigh and San Francisco, showed that departments used them not only to solve violent crimes but also for more routine offenses. About 1 in 5 location warrants were for offenses such as theft and vandalism. A detective in Scottsdale, Arizona, got one in search of somebody accused of stealing a Louis Vuitton handbag. In that investigation and many others, the Google data offered nothing useful.


In the case of the missing radio, Lieutenant Jason Borneo of the Raleigh Police Department says Google data can be “critical to obtaining stolen property,” but Google says it didn’t deliver the search data the investigators were after. They never got the radio back and have yet to make an arrest. When asked how the department learned it could get this sort of information from Google, Borneo says, “One detective became aware of the keyword search warrant from another detective.”

That’s often how it spreads: a phone call from one department to another, a suggestion from a federal investigator, a training session from an outside consultant. The reliance on Google in some cases is so extensive that police are taking what one retired judge calls a “belt and suspenders” approach, applying for location warrants even when they have other leads at their disposal. In law enforcement, as in life, sometimes it’s easier to ask Google for the answer.

Satellite image of the parking lot at 15444 N. Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd., Scottsdale, Arizona.

The purse was stolen in this parking lot.

Cooperation between American businesses and police traces as far back as the days of the telegraph. In the years after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, surveillance demands from federal agents increased dramatically. But most local police didn’t catch on to the potential of using Google location and search data to generate leads until fairly recently.

I been trying to find something that works. I never had issues with acne but the last 2 years I been dealing with more and more bumps and no matter what I try and use, it don't go away. Seems the more I wash, the worse it gets. Growing up I hardly ever used soap on my face. I just rinsed with water and used a toner to remove make-up. I am starting to wonder if the soap is causing a PH balance issue or something. I am also looking for a new serum or cream for my face, one that won't cause more pimples.