top hashtags

sixers online

Nicki Minaj is fed up and I love it!

Man, I hate Twitter and I hate the MSM. If you are not in the loop, Nicki mentioned a cousin's friend having a bad reaction after the vaccine on Twitter. She also mentioned she would not get vaccinated just to attend an event.

"They want you to get vaccinated for the Met," she said in the tweet. "If I get vaccinated it won't (be) for the Met. It'll be once I feel I've done enough research."

So in typical MSM fashion, they started labeling her an anti-vaxxer, they tried labeling her politically for it, a few places called her a conspiracy theorist, and people have been buzzing about the whole ordeal. She apparently retweeted some over on FOX and other news outlets were losing it. Especially the white liberals.

She clapped back with:

"Right. I can’t speak to, agree with, even look at someone from a particular political party. Ppl aren’t human any more. If you’re black & a Democrat tells u to shove marbles up ur ass, you simply have to. If another party tells u to look out for that bus, stand there & get hit"

She also said she is done with Twitter because of this.

T.I. and Tiny No Charges Filed for Alleged Sexual Assualt

T.I. and Tiny won't be charged for allegedly drugging and sexually assaulting a woman in 2005 in Los Angeles ... we've learned prosecutors declined to move forward with the case.

According to new legal docs, obtained by TMZ, prosecutors decided not to charge the couple because the case falls outside the statute of limitations.

As we reported ... the accuser filed a police report earlier this year, alleging T.I. and Tiny drugged and assaulted her sometime in early 2005 after the trio met at a club.

In the docs, prosecutors say the 10-year statute of limitations has expired.

Login to view embedded media
It's a similar outcome to other allegations against T.I. and Tiny in Las Vegas ... where another woman claimed she was drugged and sexually assaulted in 2010 after meeting Tiny at the airport and being invited to hang with the couple.

As we first told you ... the Las Vegas case also fell outside the statute of limitations, so there were ultimately no charges.


---

I don't know if it happened or not but if someone drugged me and raped me I'm not waiting 10 years to go to court.

In This Episode of "Do Nothing Dems"

Login to view embedded media
This dude said "We need to do something" and then says he's going to talk "Tim Scott". That's like a Jew going up to him and saying "Can you do something about Auschwitz?" and replies "Yes, I'll be meeting with Himmler about that". At this point, if you're Black and voting for the schmucks you're no better than a Black person voting for Republicans.

usher laugh

Treasury Dept. Declares IRS Will Monitor Transactions of ALL U.S. Accts Over $600

p0g3flk.jpg

Tyrannical move would allow federal government to also snoop on all crypto and cash app transactions in violation of 4th Amendment

Joe Biden’s Treasury Department has announced Thursday an invasive new initiative tasking the federal government to audit virtually all financial transactions of Americans with bank accounts holding at least $600.

The Treasury document, called “General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2022 Revenue Proposals,” outlines how every individual bank account with over $600 will be monitored by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

“This proposal would create a comprehensive financial account information reporting regime. Financial institutions would report data on financial accounts in an information return. The annual return will report gross inflows and outflows with a breakdown for physical cash, transactions with a foreign account, and transfers to and from another account with the same owner,” the memo states.

“This requirement would apply to all business and personal accounts from financial institutions, including bank, loan, and investment accounts, with the exception of accounts below a low de minimis gross flow threshold of $600 or fair market value of $600.”

This proposal will also “apply to crypto a*set exchanges and custodians.”

Patrick Hedger, vice president of policy at the Taxpayers’ Protection Alliance told the DailyMail the Treasury’s move blatantly violates the Fourth Amendment, which protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure.

“The IRS is first and foremost, a law enforcement agency, and the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures in pursuit of, of looking for wrongdoing and criminal actions, so I think this is going to run into severe Fourth Amendment headwinds,” Hedger said.

Hedger also said this targeting of lower income Americans amounts to the “ultimate regressive tax.”

“You’re going to push more folks into small cash transactions, you’re going to push more banking offshore … the big fish out there that do have sizable a*sets that are that are eligible for taxation offshore. This is the ultimate regressive tax,” Hedger said.

“You’re going to end up punishing the worst off among us … the lower income folks in this country have historically been the targets of aggressive IRS audits because they don’t have the CPAs and the lawyers to be able to f*ght back,” he added.

This tyrannical move comes in tandem with Biden’s draconian edict requiring businesses to force their employees to get the COVID injection.

The God MC, Nas Opens Up About ‘Mentally & Physically Hard’ COVID-19 Battle

Login to view embedded media
“I caught COVID in late October,” Nas said. “This is the first time [I’m] mentioning it. It was a tough time. It was mentally and physically hard. It’s just today’s world, with chemical warfare, crazy politics, racism, food shortages, police malpractice, Black-on-Black murder. The human spirit is being tested. I think that God has a plan for all of this. But right now, we’re in a serious time.”


Im glad he”s doing better.

Would you ever adopt or foster a child?

I am someone who has always wanted to have kids and a big family in general. I am hoping for a child one day with my girlfriend. Her and I have talked about it, and it's something we may consider down the road. We're still young, so I figure it's pointless to rush things right now. Anyway, during our conversations about having kids, we talked about adoption. Would you ever consider adoption? I think it's kinda great to give a kid a chance at a home.

I doubt we ever will adopt, but that's okay. What about you guys? Would you ever adopt or foster a child?

Have you ever had to go to the hospital for anything major?

Years ago I had to go to the hospital because I had a kidney stone. My side was just painful, and felt like muscle pain, but it was constant and wouldn't go away. It also kinda reminded me of growing pains, I have that feeling sometimes. Anyway, for the kidney stone, I had to drink a lot of water, and had to pass it. Surprisingly, it didn't hurt as bad as I thought it would. It was more weird, I felt more like there was pressure when it happened.

I wish kidney stones on no one though. They are a literal pain to deal with. And even though I was lucky and was able to pass it, some people aren't and have to get treatment to break the stone up, or surgery.

Anyway, that's my hospital story. Do you guys have one?

Have you ever dated someone crazy?

Have you ever dated someone who was crazy in any way? Or maybe they were different, or had weird quirks. I dated this one girl when I was in college. She was awesome in the beginning, but as we started to date more and more, I started to see signs of severe anger. Like she would get mad at the drop of a hat. One night when we were hanging out, we got to talking about life and our future. She mentioned wanting to have kids, and I let it out that I don't know if I'm ready for that. She was visibly mad at this point and started to yell at me.

I wanted to spend my life with her, but her mood swings really messed with me. And I couldn't keep up with her.

America is short more than 5 mil homes, and builders can’t make up the difference

106892105-16227583592021-06-03t221135z_1929261133_rc20tn91dvj9_rtrmadp_0_usa-economy.jpeg

Anyone searching for a home today knows full well the pickings are slim. The supply of U.S. homes for sale is near a record low, and the gap between supply and demand is widening.

The U.S. is short 5.24 million homes, an increase of 1.4 million from the 2019 gap of 3.84 million, according to new research from Realtor.com.

The U.S. Census found that 12.3 million American households were formed from January 2012 to June 2021, but just 7 million new single-family homes were built during that time.

Single-family home construction has suffered from a severe labor shortage that began well before the pandemic but was then exacerbated by it. Supply chain disruptions in the past year have pushed prices for building materials higher, and as pandemic-induced demand soared, prices for land increased as well.

While new household formation is actually slower than it was before the pandemic, homebuilders would have to double their recent new home production pace to close the gap in five to six years. A new household can be either owner-occupied or rented.




I wish there would be a federal investment in housing so that we can reach an equilibrium in supply and demand. This inventory shortage is destroying people in coastal cities. How do you think we can fix it?

Old laws that are still active today, is it time we change it up?

I know there are a ton of laws in the books all over the US, that are probably very dated. Like dumb laws that would make absolutely no sense today. I found an article that lists some of the dumbest laws still in effect to this very day. Some of them are quite laughable. My favorite, probably being the one where it's against the law to harass bigfoot in Washington. It's the first one on the list, and hands down is my fave haha.

It's illegal to collect rainwater in Colorado. Some of my other favorites on this list are:

  • A pickle is not a pickle unless it bounces - Connecticut
  • Chickens are not permitted to cross the road - Georgia (Quitman)
  • No false promises allowed - Louisiana
  • It is prohibited to frighten a baby - Missouri (Mole)
  • Drinking of milk is mandatory - Utah
  • it is prohibited to catch a fish using a lasso - Tennessee (Yeeehaww, I caught me a fish with ma lasso I did) lol
  • No one shall participate in a duel - Ohio
What are some of your favorites? And what are some other laws not on the list do you think should be changed? Also find the full list of 50 laws below.

Dating a friend's sister, good or bad?

A friend of mine has this awesome sister I am very into. We all hang out sometimes, and I think she's hilarious, sexy and smart all rolled into one person. But.... she happens to be one of my best friends sisters. I haven't told my friend about this either, but I've considered asking her out on an official date, but I don't know how my friend would take it. Should I just be flat out honest and ask my friend if he has my blessing to ask her out? Or should I just ask her out without asking him? We're all adults, but still, I feel like I'm kinda stabbing him in the back if I don't at least let him know.

Idk, would you date a friend's sibling?

How do you think the average white person would respond to this?

I heard about a college teacher (I believe it was at a college though it may have been a high school) who asked a room full of students, most of which were white, a simple question. He asked if the students were alive in the time period where slavery was acceptable, would they disagree and oppose it. Everyone raised their hands to show they would. He then asked if they would share something about themselves that goes against society's norms and would cause most people to look at them differently, hate them, or completely shun them from society. None of them could do it.

The point he was making is that most people today who believe they would oppose something like this would go along with it because they seek to be acceptable in society. They would not be willing to risk anything for someone else's safety or comfort. They are not free-thinkers but do-as-I-sayers. I reflect with this story heavily on the white liberals in the US who go out of their way for BLM and other black causes, they want to make it known to everyone that they stand for black empowerment but they do so only because it is considered to be socially acceptable (and heavily encouraged) in today's social climate. They are doing it for themselves, not for us.

What are your thoughts on this?

Trending